Why do Bloggers use Pseudonyms?

I generally shy away from blogging under articles and this is sad because blogging is a great way to express your views and garner public opinion on any topic.

I have noticed that people love to blog but do so under a made up name.

I want to believe, based on what I observe, that this is done to hide their identity. Why? I conclude, maybe wrongly so, that this is because the majority of the blogs are negative and not constructive to the topic at hand.

The bloggers who hide behind pseudonyms generally write with hatred, malice, envy, no good intentions and to stir up bad blood! They often use several names to get several points across, trying to make people think that this negativity is popular.

Seldom you would find bloggers commenting on something positive and funny enough even if they do, they still use pseudonyms! Am I missing something?

Ok, perhaps in a small society one does not want to be labelled as being affiliated with a particular group or subscribing to a certain opinion.

If this is for fear of recrimination, that is sad. Because in a democratic society, one must be allowed to have a voice, freely. Once of course you are not creating a riot or anything of the sort that would cause harm to people.

If this is just adopting or adapting to the status quo, that is also sad. We should feel free to take a stand and be leaders not followers, as appropriate. We should not feel pressured into doing as the crowd does, for very often we find that that is not the best thing to do.

But of course, who likes to be criticized or ridiculed? No one!

Most bloggers tend to attack other bloggers as opposed to discussing the issue at hand.

What kind of community are we developing if we relish tearing down as opposed to building up? Do we consider the legacy or lack thereof we are leaving for our children and future generations if we continue to contribute to this vile? Does it matter at all?

I dare say it does, it should, it must!

And to be clear, this is not a call for bloggers to use their real names. This would be a call for everyone, while contributing to a debate, to be constructive!

Troubling Journalism?

I continue to be troubled by the trend of my noble profession of journalism and wonder whether I ‘retired’ too early.

Not that I could change the world, but am just saying…

In my time, I had the pleasure of working with some of the Caribbean’s leading journalists, particularly during my stint at Radio Antilles and filing for the Caribbean News Agency, Associated Press and BBC Caribbean.

I believe these were some great years and I look back and cherish those moments, thankful that my career started then and not now.

Why do I say that?

There is the lack of respect by many for the journalist and the lack of ethics that some journalists portray that worries me.

This would not be the first time that a journalist has been threatened with imprisonment or worse, for in fact, the history books would record where journalists have been kidnapped and even put to death for doing their job.

This would also not be the first time that journalists have compromised ethics for a scoop.

In the international media, as it relates to the British Virgin Islands, there is that leak of information that can damage the financial services industry of this Territory. Financial services is one of the economic twin pillars of these islands and its loss or any part thereof can be debilitating.

What the international media has to gain by publishing this information is beyond me!

We also have a situation here in the Virgin Islands where an online news agency, in my view, has breached protocol by accepting highly confidential information leaked from the government (nothing may necessarily be wrong with that), but has published that information ahead of it being made public in the House of Assembly, all in the name of upstaging its media competitors.

This may be arguable from the point of view that ratings are important, the information would eventually be made public anyway and most of all that the information is factual and perhaps even warrants an investigation into the workings of government.

On the other hand, was it critically important to release the information days ahead of it being officially released? In fact, in this case, we see that although the Report was eventually laid on the Table of the House of Assembly, which then made it a public document, it was later withdrawn because of questions raised by the Opposition!

Of course, the credibility of the news agency is being called into question now. I am personally disappointed in this news agency, which I considered the more professional of the lot. Now I wonder.

I believe timing is important, ethics must be maintained and this dog eat dog cut throat mentality that pervades society must not continue to be this dominant, especially in a profession that everyone depends on to hold society accountable. You might say here that this is a paradox, but I insist that in this case, the news agency could have at least waited 5 minutes until after the Report was made public to publish its article. Write the article and hold it until such time!

Then internationally, another journalist will know her fate on Wednesday after she upheld her right, according to Journalism 101, that a journalist should never reveal her/his source. She was reporting on information she received that might have prevented a killing in the United States.

I continue to say – journalists must continue to be held accountable for their mandate to build up and not destabilize a country/community. In addition, journalists must be allowed to practice their profession without fear or favour.

To accomplish this, we (yes I said we) need to band together and recognize that we are on the same team trying to accomplish the same goals!

Or are we? Therein may lie the problem that we oftentimes create for ourselves.

Where do we draw the line colleagues, between ratings and sensationalism and good journalism!?

Photo Caption:

My colleagues at the Radio Antilles newsroom of 1989. Spot me? Don’t laugh! That was over 20 years ago, ok!